Skip to main content

Men In Black International -- a review


You can tell, right off the bat, that there’s a problem with Men In Black International (MIB:I) from the way the movie opens. We get a flashback scene of the two MIB:I agents H (Chris Hemsworth) and High T (Liam Neeson) fighting aliens at the Eifel Tower in Paris. After watching this sequence--which falls flat with lame humor--we then flashback even further, to when a young Molly (Mandeiya Flory) watches her parents get zapped into forgetting their alien encounter by two MIB agents. But Molly herself retains her memory, and when she grows up (her adult role taken over by Tessa Thompson), she begins a rabid search for this mysterious organization, until the day she finds them and tries to bluff her way into their headquarters.



Personally, I felt that MIB:I would have been a much more enjoyable movie had they begun it with little Molly watching her parents get zapped, and continued onward from just her POV. Just show us the fleeting glimpses of the MIB organization that Molly sees, until she becomes an agent herself--that might have been a better way to re-introduce the MIB franchise to a new generation of viewers. But as it stands, with the silly opening in Paris, the introduction of the MIB universe is squandered in favor of cheap laughs, which is what a lot of big-budget Hollywood movies strive for these days (and wind up falling flat on their face at the box office; this was the financial fate that MIB:I suffered, as well).



Chris Hemsworth and Tessa Thompson both co-starred in Thor: Ragnarok and Avengers: Endgame, where they’ve proven to have on-screen chemistry. And yet that same chemistry to nowhere to be seen here in MIB:I. In fact, Hemsworth plays his Agent H with such slack-jawed incompetence that Agent M, eager to impress her new employers, seemed annoyed just to be seen with him. In the original MIB trilogy, Will Smith proved that he could play comedy without coming off as a total buffoon (and even when he was a buffoon, Smith was still sympathetic). But instead of being presented as being efficient agents, both Agent H and M seem like they’re ineptly surviving one calamity after another in this movie.



Another problem with MIB:I is the villains. There’s no real central villain, with the movie changing through one bad guy after another while trying desperately to be a mystery of sorts--yet the writing just isn’t strong enough to support this kind of story line, so it winds up being a half-hearted mystery with action scenes that you can’t take too seriously because God knows the movie doesn’t want you to. MIB:I is all over the place in terms of tone: it tries to be a comedy while trying to get the viewer to still take its threats seriously. And in the end, it’s such a mess that MIB:I winds up pleasing nobody. Oh well, at least we still have the original MIB films. --SF



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Jack Reacher Never Go Back -- a Review

I was first introduced to Jack Reacher through the Tom Cruise movie of the same name that was released back in 2012. I liked the movie well enough, despite a few nitpicks here and there--but I really enjoyed reading the novels by Lee Child. Jack Reacher was a former US Army officer who retires and becomes a drifter, roaming from state to state in the country that he fought so hard to protect. And Reacher is still protecting us, taking on a variety of villains, from backwoods mobsters to big-city terrorists from book to book. The stories in the books are well-told, with great attention paid to the smallest of details. I think of them as 1980s action films, only without being insulting to your intelligence. What a perfect series to adapt to movies, right? Well, Tom Cruise looks nothing like how Jack Reacher is described in the books. And while I thought the first Jack Reacher film was good, the second, Jack Reacher: Never Go Back , is very badly flawed. Based on the JR novel of the sa...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Holdovers -- a review

It’s always a joy to watch someone who’s a master at their work, whether it’s a musician, an artist, or an actor. Most great actors make it look easy--which is not to say that I think acting is an easy job. I know from personal experience that acting is very hard. It’s a skill that the talented make look very easy, and one of the most talented actors working today is Paul Giamatti. If you’ve watched some movies over the past few years, chances are very good that you’ve already seen Paul Giamatti. He was the jittery earthquake expert in San Andreas , the sympathetic police chief in The Illusionist , and as the titular John Adams (a part that got him the Emmy and a Golden Globe) in the 2008 HBO series of the same name. Recently, I saw Paul Giamatti in the superb The Holdovers , a movie that I wasn’t planning on writing up, but I kept thinking about it--and all of its characters--long after I saw it. In The Holdovers , Giamatti plays Paul H...
Post a Comment
Read more

Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice -- a review

Despite coming out thirty six years after the first film, Beetlejuice Beetlejuice , once again directed by Tim Burton, wound up being vastly entertaining, adding lots of pleasant surprises, like the use of stop-motion animation. The sequel takes place within the same real-life time frame, with Lydia Deetz, played with wry humor by Winona Ryder, now the host of a ghost hunting show. She’s also the mother of Astrid, a teenager played by Jenna Ortega. They live with Delia Deetz (the always great Catherine O'Hara), Lydia’s step-mother and Astrid’s step-grandmother. After the death of Charles--Delia’s husband and Lydia’s father--during a bird-watching accident involving sharks, the Deetz ladies must go back up to the creepy house in Winter River, Connecticut for his funeral. This is the same place where Lydia first encountered Beetlejuice all those years ago, and she is understandably reluctant to even mention his name, lest she accidentally calls forth Beet...
Post a Comment
Read more