Skip to main content

The Mummy 2017 -- a review


The Mummy, the 2017 version of the classic Universal monster, crashed and burned at the box office this past summer (although it did extremely well at the overseas box office). It strived to be a far more vibrant and exciting version of the Boris Karloff version of the Mummy that was released in 1932, to which this film was often compared to in its promotional and publicity materials. And yeah, the Karloff Mummy is very dated and creaky--with the exception of a still-chilling sequence of an expedition member going insane with horror at the (off-screen) sight of the Mummy making its way out of its tomb.


Yet Universal seems to have forgotten its other Mummy remake, the superb film that was released in 1999 with Brendan Fraiser and Rachel Weitz that--unlike the Tom Cruise version--was such a hit that it spawned two sequels. The Fraiser version had a sense of fun and high adventure that effortlessly blended humor and horror into an extremely enjoyable package that stands up to repeated viewings even to this day. But the Tom Cruise version has none of this. So what happened with the brand spanking new version with Tom Cruise? Part of the problem was with Cruise himself.



While Tom Cruise may well be a world-wide superstar, I never really thought he was a very strong actor. When you see him in films like Valkyrie, where he’s surrounded by an impeccable cast of actors, he’s usually the weakest link. That’s because Cruise basically plays himself in each and every film--which works very well in the Mission Impossible films, but it doesn’t here. In The Mummy Cruise is playing a U.S. soldier who’s supposed to be one of these likeable scoundrels that’s always out for himself in a humorous vein.


But I don’t even believe Cruise as a soldier here, much less a lovable rascal. He’s badly miscast in The Mummy, in the part of an adventurous rogue that Harrison Ford played to perfection in the Indiana Jones films. Even Brendan Fraiser was very good and completely believable as ’shoot-first-ask-questions-later’ Rick O’Connell in his Mummy films. As a result of Cruise’s miscasting, his very presence drags down the film overall, which feels more like just another one of his action films, instead of a horror thriller. This is a shame, because Sofia Boutella, who was very good in Star Trek Beyond, manages to shine whenever she’s allowed to here as the Mummy.



The other problem with the new Mummy is that it is the first film in the new Dark Universe saga, and we are reminded of this by the presence of Russell Crowe as Henry Jekyll (yep, the same dude who turns into Mr. Hyde), who runs a special monster squad that captures monsters and keeps their body parts in specimen jars after presumably performing horrific experiments on them (wait, who are really the monsters, here?). Valuable screen time that could have been devoted to battling the Mummy (remember her?), is instead wasted on twitchy Dr. Jekyll and his group of minions--who feel more like an intrusion on the story that I actually wanted to see.


So the new Mummy winds up being a faulty action/adventure/comedy that forgot it was a horror movie that spends the better part of its running time advertising an upcoming series of Dark Universe films which may or may not even be happening now that this incarnation of the Mummy has bombed (at least in the US). Excuse me while I go watch the Mummy again--you know, the good one with Brendan Frasier and Rachel Weitz. And I’m even going to re-watch the original Mummy with Karloff, because--creaky or not--it’s got Karloff, a sturdy actor and a class act who was never, ever miscast in his entire career. --SF







Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Jack Reacher Never Go Back -- a Review

I was first introduced to Jack Reacher through the Tom Cruise movie of the same name that was released back in 2012. I liked the movie well enough, despite a few nitpicks here and there--but I really enjoyed reading the novels by Lee Child. Jack Reacher was a former US Army officer who retires and becomes a drifter, roaming from state to state in the country that he fought so hard to protect. And Reacher is still protecting us, taking on a variety of villains, from backwoods mobsters to big-city terrorists from book to book. The stories in the books are well-told, with great attention paid to the smallest of details. I think of them as 1980s action films, only without being insulting to your intelligence. What a perfect series to adapt to movies, right? Well, Tom Cruise looks nothing like how Jack Reacher is described in the books. And while I thought the first Jack Reacher film was good, the second, Jack Reacher: Never Go Back , is very badly flawed. Based on the JR novel of the sa...
Post a Comment
Read more

3 Body Problem

3 Body Problem , Netflix’s latest TV series, is loosely based on the first novel in the Remembrance of Earth's Past trilogy, by Chinese author Liu Cixin (who also wrote the book The Wandering Earth ). Simply put, it’s an alien invasion story, but one that’s a lot more sophisticated than your average ‘pew-pew-pew’ cliché-fest. For one thing, this series begins in the 1960s, in the middle of the Cultural Revolution, which was the nationwide purge instigated within China by then-Chairman Mao to keep himself in power. A young woman named Ye Wenjie arises from the chaos to become a central figure in the overall story. The 3 Body Problem of this series’ name refers to a far-flung solar system that has three suns. Any planet within this tri-sun system would have a hard time of it, taking turns orbiting one belligerent sun after another, and it just so happens that the aliens who set their eyes on invading Earth--known as the San-Ti--come from this embattled world. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Holdovers -- a review

It’s always a joy to watch someone who’s a master at their work, whether it’s a musician, an artist, or an actor. Most great actors make it look easy--which is not to say that I think acting is an easy job. I know from personal experience that acting is very hard. It’s a skill that the talented make look very easy, and one of the most talented actors working today is Paul Giamatti. If you’ve watched some movies over the past few years, chances are very good that you’ve already seen Paul Giamatti. He was the jittery earthquake expert in San Andreas , the sympathetic police chief in The Illusionist , and as the titular John Adams (a part that got him the Emmy and a Golden Globe) in the 2008 HBO series of the same name. Recently, I saw Paul Giamatti in the superb The Holdovers , a movie that I wasn’t planning on writing up, but I kept thinking about it--and all of its characters--long after I saw it. In The Holdovers , Giamatti plays Paul H...
Post a Comment
Read more