Skip to main content

28 Years Later -- a review

With 28 Years Later, director Danny Boyle returns to the zombie saga that he began with 28 Days Later. The direct sequel, 28 Weeks Later, was directed by Juan Carlos Fresnadillo. At the end of 28 Weeks Later, the zombies were busting out of England and sprawling onto the European continent. But in 28 Years Later, the “zombies” (who are still-living humans infected with a rage virus) have been pushed back into England, and the entire British Isles has now become something like New York City in John Carpenter’s Escape From New York: a vast wasteland that has been placed under quarantine by the outside world.

But the British Isles are not all gloom and doom. A small village of non-infected humans are thriving on an island off the Scottish coast. Despite being shunned by the rest of the world, these hardy people have formed their own way of life and customs. They’re protected by a natural causeway that connects their island to the mainland--a causeway that sinks below the waves at every high tide. Alfie Williams stars as Spike, a twelve year old boy who’s decided to become a hunter for his village. And so he goes on his very first hunt on the mainland with his father, Jamie (the always sturdy Aaron Taylor Johnson).

28 years into this zombie apocalypse sees the zombies looking more like cavemen, with wild, untamed nature having taken over the abandoned towns and villages around them. The gore effects are so good that they’re actually too good in some scenes, with no graphic detail left unseen. Alfie Williams is very good as Spike, a boy calmly trying to find his way in what most of us would consider a very crazy situation. He has a strong moral compass for someone so young, which serves him well, and immediately puts the viewer on his side.

Jodie Comer is also superb as Spike’s mother, Isla, who’s gravely ill, but is forced to suffer with her unknown affliction because their village has no doctor. And Ralph Fiennes is great as the mysterious Doctor Ian Kelson, who’s probably the most fascinating character here, with his slow and steady one-man purge of the infected--as well as dealing with their remains--which he treats almost like it’s a sacred ritual (and that may well be).

28 Years Later is very well done, having been ably directed once more by Danny Boyle, with a solid script by Alex Garland (Civil War), who also wrote the first film. This jump ahead from a zombie apocalypse is fascinating to see, because it very effectively extrapolates how humans and their society would evolve from such a crisis years later. The only problem I had with 28 Years Later is that it’s the first half of a two part story. Its sequel, The Bone Temple, was shot back to back with it and will be released in January, 2026. While the first movie still resolves some of its plot points at the end, it still ends on a cliffhanger. So you may want to wait until both films are available to you to see the whole captivating story. --SF

28 Years Later is available on streaming and physical media.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Conjuring: Last Rites

Whether you believe in the “true” exploits of demonologists Ed & Lorraine Warren or not (I don’t), The Conjuring series of films, based on their “true” stories, have all been very entertaining, with everything now supposedly coming to an end with The Conjuring: Last Rites . After a prologue in 1964, where we witness the traumatic birth of the Warren’s daughter, Judy, the rest of the movie advances to 1986, with the Warrens now somewhat retired. They’re still speaking at colleges, before giggly students who crack Ghostbusters jokes at them, but the Warrens have ceased personally investigating creepy cases on their own. That is, until their good friend Father Gordon (Steve Coulter) winds up hanging from a noose, thanks to a demonic attack. Father Gordon had been trying to get the Warrens to investigate the case of the Smurls--a family in Pennsylvania who are suffering through a severe haunting in their house, and when the Warrens finally do get involved, the demons come...

Logan's Run -- a review

I first saw Logan’s Run in a New Jersey movie theater fifty years ago, when I was a boy. The theater, somewhere in the suburban wilds of the Garden State, was packed to the gills with people. I wasn’t sure what to expect with the movie back then—all I cared about that it was a brand new science fiction film, in an age when big budget SF properties on both TV and the big screen was very rare (of course, Star Wars , which would be released the very next year, would change all of that). Based on the 1967 novel of the same name by William F. Nolan and George Clayton Johnson, Logan’s Run is a futuristic tale about a man named Logan 5 (Michael York) who has a special job in a place filled with hedonistic leisure. Logan lives within the splendor of a Utopian society whose population dwells within large domes. The interior is presented as a vast, upscale shopping mall where its citizens want for nothing. Every need, every whim, and every fantasy is met. Of course, there’s a catc...

The Housemaid

The Housemaid (from 2025—not to be confused with the 2010 film of the same name) is based on the first book in a psychological thriller series by author Freida McFadden. Sydney Sweeney stars as Millie Calloway. a young woman down on her luck who’s struggling after being released on parole from jail. While living in her car, Millie applies for a live-in maid position with a wealthy family, Nina (Amanda Seyfried) & Andrew (Brandon Sklenar) Winchester, and their young daughter, Cecelia (Indiana Elle) and—to her delight—she gets the job. But, of course, once Millie starts working her maid gig, that’s when the real horror show begins. Despite acting like she was in Millie’s corner in the beginning, Nina deliberately creates problems for Millie that make her look bad. It turns out that Nina is a whack-job who’s served time at a mental facility for trying to kill her own daughter when she was a baby, and now Nina’s got Millie in her sights. If The Housemaid sounds like some ...