Skip to main content

Bram Stoker's Dracula -- a look back

I first saw Bram Stoker’s Dracula when it was initially released in theaters in November of 1992, and I recall expecting to see a serious, solemn drama that was based on the classic horror novel that was written in the 19th century by Stoker. But I also remember being pleasantly surprised by the luscious, imaginative cinematic dark fairy tale that was weaved onscreen by Francis Ford Coppola, the visionary director of the Godfather trilogy, along with The Conversation, and Apocalypse Now (the latter being my all-time favorite Coppola film). Um, Coppola also gave us the lame Jack, with Robin Williams as a boy who pre-maturely grew into a man, but nobody's perfect.

While Coppola presented the Dracula story with complete seriousness, he also seemed to have a great deal of fun with the subject matter, as well, presenting the movie as a lurid fever dream by using every in-camera movie trick in the book (even a few from the silent film era), with the lone exception being optical effects used for the eerie blue rings seen on the desolate roads in Transylvania. Coppola also assembled a great cast to tell his then-updated tale of the legendary Count Dracula, and the dark horrors he brought to an unsuspecting London.

Gary Oldman played Dracula with great passion and zeal, immersing himself into the part just as much as he immersed himself into the still-impressive make up effects. Winona Ryder, who had previously dropped out of Coppola’s third Godfather film, thankfully rejoined the maestro here as Mina Harker, an innocent young woman who is personally targeted by the Count. Anthony Hopkins--just a year after his success as Hannibal Lector in The Silence of the Lambs--gleefully chews the scenery as Van Helsing, Dracula’s adversary.

Even the supporting cast was filled with superb actors: Sadie Frost as Lucy Westenra, and as the three men who are her suitors: Richard E. Grant as a psychiatrist in charge of an asylum, Cary Elwes, as Lord Holmwood, and Billy Campbell as Quincy P. Morris. And Renfield, Dracula’s bug-eating, wild-eyed servant, is played in an inspired and perfect bit of casting by actor/singer Tom Waits. The only casting misstep would be Keanu Reeves, as Jonathan Harker, whose performance is so stilted, he feels like he’s in a different movie--and Reeves freely admitted later that he was exhausted and suffering from low energy while shooting this film.

However, even thirty years later, Bram Stoker’s Dracula still holds up very well, thanks to Coppola treating its soapy shadowy horror story with complete conviction, and framing it within such a scrumptious and bold tapestry that makes it great eye candy to watch even now. If you can’t catch it in a revival house, then try to watch it on the biggest TV you have, and turn off all of the lights in the room, in order to best appreciate this bloody, visually stunning valentine to the timeless Count Dracula. --SF

Bram Stoker's Dracula is available on physical media and streaming.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jack Reacher Never Go Back -- a Review

I was first introduced to Jack Reacher through the Tom Cruise movie of the same name that was released back in 2012. I liked the movie well enough, despite a few nitpicks here and there--but I really enjoyed reading the novels by Lee Child. Jack Reacher was a former US Army officer who retires and becomes a drifter, roaming from state to state in the country that he fought so hard to protect. And Reacher is still protecting us, taking on a variety of villains, from backwoods mobsters to big-city terrorists from book to book. The stories in the books are well-told, with great attention paid to the smallest of details. I think of them as 1980s action films, only without being insulting to your intelligence. What a perfect series to adapt to movies, right? Well, Tom Cruise looks nothing like how Jack Reacher is described in the books. And while I thought the first Jack Reacher film was good, the second, Jack Reacher: Never Go Back , is very badly flawed. Based on the JR novel of the sa...

The Holdovers -- a review

It’s always a joy to watch someone who’s a master at their work, whether it’s a musician, an artist, or an actor. Most great actors make it look easy--which is not to say that I think acting is an easy job. I know from personal experience that acting is very hard. It’s a skill that the talented make look very easy, and one of the most talented actors working today is Paul Giamatti. If you’ve watched some movies over the past few years, chances are very good that you’ve already seen Paul Giamatti. He was the jittery earthquake expert in San Andreas , the sympathetic police chief in The Illusionist , and as the titular John Adams (a part that got him the Emmy and a Golden Globe) in the 2008 HBO series of the same name. Recently, I saw Paul Giamatti in the superb The Holdovers , a movie that I wasn’t planning on writing up, but I kept thinking about it--and all of its characters--long after I saw it. In The Holdovers , Giamatti plays Paul H...

Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice -- a review

Despite coming out thirty six years after the first film, Beetlejuice Beetlejuice , once again directed by Tim Burton, wound up being vastly entertaining, adding lots of pleasant surprises, like the use of stop-motion animation. The sequel takes place within the same real-life time frame, with Lydia Deetz, played with wry humor by Winona Ryder, now the host of a ghost hunting show. She’s also the mother of Astrid, a teenager played by Jenna Ortega. They live with Delia Deetz (the always great Catherine O'Hara), Lydia’s step-mother and Astrid’s step-grandmother. After the death of Charles--Delia’s husband and Lydia’s father--during a bird-watching accident involving sharks, the Deetz ladies must go back up to the creepy house in Winter River, Connecticut for his funeral. This is the same place where Lydia first encountered Beetlejuice all those years ago, and she is understandably reluctant to even mention his name, lest she accidentally calls forth Beet...