Skip to main content

Star Trek The Motion Picture -- a review


I was a Star Trek fan since I was a little spud. Although I don’t remember it, my parents told me that, as a toddler, I watched the original Star Trek series with them when it first aired in the late sixties. But it wasn’t until Star Trek was in syndication in the seventies that I really got into the series. Aside from being a thrilling SF adventure, Star Trek was a constant, soothing reminder for me that we humans would still be striving for a brighter future, no matter how dire the present day appeared--which was a very reassuring thing to hear for a boy growing up in the seventies.



When I first heard that Star Trek was returning in late 1979 as a movie, I was extremely happy. I remember being thrilled at the ads for the film that appeared on the back of comic books--which showed a redesign of the Enterprise that didn’t quite match the final refit ship seen in the movie, but I didn’t care. I finally saw Star Trek: The Motion Picture with my father during a wondrous science fiction double bill weekend with (The Black Hole). And my teen self loved it.



Taking place a couple of years after the end of the series, ST:TMP shows Admiral Kirk and the crew of the Enterprise hurriedly getting their recently reconditioned ship ready when a giant alien entity--which already wiped out three Klingon battle cruisers and a Federation space station--starts heading straight for Earth. As luck would have it, the Enterprise is the only Federation vessel within the region that can intercept the intruder, and there’s no guarantee that the modernized vessel can even stop this incoming threat.



Directed by Robert Wise--who also directed such classics as West Side Story, The Sound of Music, and The Day The Earth Stood Still--ST:TMP, the movie, faced a similar problem as the Enterprise did in that it was still being worked on almost right up to its premiere. As a result of this, the film was not able to be seen by a preview audience, which would normally give the filmmakers valuable information as to what worked and what didn’t. Overall, as a film, ST:TMP wound up being very uneven. Despite the fact that I loved the film when I first saw it, even I had to admit that ST:TMP is overlong and ponderous, especially in its middle section.



But despite its flaws, I was still a big fan of the movie, for no other reason that it reunited the original cast of Star Trek for a new series of cinematic adventures. TMP also aspired to be true to the original series by having its heroes solve problems with their heads instead of their fists. The fact that the brutish Klingons tried to defeat the intruder with their military might, and failed, is very telling. Kirk, Spock and the rest of the crew of the Enterprise would later eschew the use of force in favor of analyzing the problems before them, which led to much better results for all.



This is truly classic Star Trek in a nutshell: try and understand the problem and then create a solution without blasting at it with your weapons--although if they needed to resort to force on Star Trek, they did. But one of the points of the show was that force should always be the last resort.



Another thing that ST:TMP did well was to resolve the whole half human/half Vulcan issue that Spock wrestled with in the show. ST:TMP saw Spock coming to grips with who and what he was and finally being at peace with it. And the marvelous score for ST:TMP, composed by the legendary Jerry Goldsmith, is wondrous. If you can, try and catch the Director’s Edition of ST:TMP, where Robert Wise reworked the film more to his vision, and it wound up being much better for it. I prefer the Director’s Edition because it finally feels like a finished film that’s more tightly edited (with new special effects).


But no matter what version--theatrical, or Director’s Edition--of Star Trek: The Motion Picture that you see, it’s still recommended for devout Star Trek fans, as well as those who enjoy their science fiction to be of the more cerebral kind. --SF


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jack Reacher Never Go Back -- a Review

I was first introduced to Jack Reacher through the Tom Cruise movie of the same name that was released back in 2012. I liked the movie well enough, despite a few nitpicks here and there--but I really enjoyed reading the novels by Lee Child. Jack Reacher was a former US Army officer who retires and becomes a drifter, roaming from state to state in the country that he fought so hard to protect. And Reacher is still protecting us, taking on a variety of villains, from backwoods mobsters to big-city terrorists from book to book. The stories in the books are well-told, with great attention paid to the smallest of details. I think of them as 1980s action films, only without being insulting to your intelligence. What a perfect series to adapt to movies, right? Well, Tom Cruise looks nothing like how Jack Reacher is described in the books. And while I thought the first Jack Reacher film was good, the second, Jack Reacher: Never Go Back , is very badly flawed. Based on the JR novel of the sa...

3 Body Problem

3 Body Problem , Netflix’s latest TV series, is loosely based on the first novel in the Remembrance of Earth's Past trilogy, by Chinese author Liu Cixin (who also wrote the book The Wandering Earth ). Simply put, it’s an alien invasion story, but one that’s a lot more sophisticated than your average ‘pew-pew-pew’ cliché-fest. For one thing, this series begins in the 1960s, in the middle of the Cultural Revolution, which was the nationwide purge instigated within China by then-Chairman Mao to keep himself in power. A young woman named Ye Wenjie arises from the chaos to become a central figure in the overall story. The 3 Body Problem of this series’ name refers to a far-flung solar system that has three suns. Any planet within this tri-sun system would have a hard time of it, taking turns orbiting one belligerent sun after another, and it just so happens that the aliens who set their eyes on invading Earth--known as the San-Ti--come from this embattled world. ...

The Holdovers -- a review

It’s always a joy to watch someone who’s a master at their work, whether it’s a musician, an artist, or an actor. Most great actors make it look easy--which is not to say that I think acting is an easy job. I know from personal experience that acting is very hard. It’s a skill that the talented make look very easy, and one of the most talented actors working today is Paul Giamatti. If you’ve watched some movies over the past few years, chances are very good that you’ve already seen Paul Giamatti. He was the jittery earthquake expert in San Andreas , the sympathetic police chief in The Illusionist , and as the titular John Adams (a part that got him the Emmy and a Golden Globe) in the 2008 HBO series of the same name. Recently, I saw Paul Giamatti in the superb The Holdovers , a movie that I wasn’t planning on writing up, but I kept thinking about it--and all of its characters--long after I saw it. In The Holdovers , Giamatti plays Paul H...