Skip to main content

Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom -- a review


I first saw Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom in the theater back when it first came out thirty five years ago this week. I was nineteen in the summer of 1984, and I loved the Temple of Doom so much then that I promptly watched it three times in the theaters (movies coming out on home video at that time was a little sketchy; so if I really liked a movie, I usually had to see it as often as I could in the theater). I was a huge fan of Raiders of the Lost Ark (and still am), and, back in 1984, I considered watching Temple of Doom almost like revisiting an old friend.

I’ve seen Temple of Doom several times since on home video, first on VHS and then DVD, and I have to admit that each time I re-watched the film my love for it has lessened more and more. When I recently saw it again in preparation for this 35th anniversary review…well, to be honest, while I still enjoyed certain aspects of Temple of Doom, overall, the film is not one of my favorites. One of the reasons that it doesn’t stand the test of time is the fact that Spielberg and Lucas break with the globe-trotting formula that made Raiders of the Lost Ark so much fun.



Like the Bond films, Indiana Jones dashes all over the world in Raiders (as well as in The Last Crusade, and Crystal Skull) and by having the series take place in the 1930s, Indy’s travels felt even more exotic and exciting because they occurred during a now-lost age. But Temple of Doom only has two locales: Shanghai, China, and then India, where Indy spends the rest of the movie clashing with a resurgence of the real-life Thuggee cult (they arose in India back in the 19th century; they were defeated by the British Army). The lack of world-wide travel in Temple of Doom makes it feel stagnated, and this only helps to slow the pacing of the film.



And I haven’t even mentioned the tone. Despite the wild and cheery opening in Shanghai, where we’re introduced to singer Willie Scott (played by the endearing Kate Capshaw) during a chaotic gun fight in a night club (called Club Obi Wan, of course), the film’s pacing slows to a crawl once we arrive in India, where Indy is pressed into service helping a village whose children have all been abducted. The villagers’ holy man claimed that Indy was sent to them by their god, a story element that robs Indy of his free will, which goes against the grain of who and what the fiercely independent Indiana Jones is supposed to be.



Led by the wonderfully intimidating Mola Ram (superbly played with great menace by Amrish Puri), the revived Thuggee cult practices a human sacrificial ceremony where Mola Ram rips out the still-beating heart of his victim, all on camera. In trying to invoke a more horror movie feel, Spielberg goes dark here, really dark. Temple of Doom was one of the movies released during the summer of 1984 (the other one being Gremlins) that created such an outcry over the violence and gore on display--all within its deceptive PG rating--that it resulted in the formation of the PG-13 rating, which we still have today.



But thanks to its overly dour storyline, which clashes with its air-headed popcorn film aesthetic in the first part of the film, as well as its latter half, Temple of Doom is my least favorite of the Indiana Jones saga. Its depictions of child slavery, with children being whipped and chained up onscreen, are still extremely hard to watch. It definitely feels like Lucas and Spielberg have taken things way too far in their quest to emulate the heart of darkness aspect of this story. Add to this the juvenile humor of the “chilled monkey brains” sequence, and Temple of Doom ultimately feels cheap and hollow in how it consistently aims for the lowest common denominator.



Fortunately, the Indy saga would correct itself very nicely with the next two films (and yeah, I actually enjoyed Kingdom of the Crystal Skull very much)--and with any luck, we’ll get the long-gestating fifth and (probably) final Indiana Jones flick with Harrison Ford very soon. One more adventure with the swashbuckling archeologist played by the actor who originated the role would be really nice to see before Disney starts making changes when they inevitably re-cast Indy with a younger actor down the road. --SF





Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Rebel Moon Part One -- a review

Director Zack Snyder has made enough of my favorite films ( Man of Steel , Zack Snyder’s Justice League , the Dawn of the Dead remake) that I genuinely look forward to his latest project. Of course, he’s also made some real stinkers ( Sucker Punch , Batman Vs Superman ), but everybody has a bad day at the office, right? And I was brightened up considerably when I saw that his latest film, the star-spanning space saga Rebel Moon: Part One: A Child of Fire , would be premiering on my birthday on Netflix. And then I saw the frigging movie. Seriously, WTF did I do to deserve this on my birthday? Rebel Moon first started out life as a pitch for an R-rated Star Wars film that Lucasfilm, the producers of SW, had turned down. Undaunted, Snyder then brought the project to Netflix, and traces of its Star Wars inspiration still remain: the space Nazis, a scene in a cantina, the laser swords that one of the characters uses. But even if a film is
Post a Comment
Read more

Jack Reacher Never Go Back -- a Review

I was first introduced to Jack Reacher through the Tom Cruise movie of the same name that was released back in 2012. I liked the movie well enough, despite a few nitpicks here and there--but I really enjoyed reading the novels by Lee Child. Jack Reacher was a former US Army officer who retires and becomes a drifter, roaming from state to state in the country that he fought so hard to protect. And Reacher is still protecting us, taking on a variety of villains, from backwoods mobsters to big-city terrorists from book to book. The stories in the books are well-told, with great attention paid to the smallest of details. I think of them as 1980s action films, only without being insulting to your intelligence. What a perfect series to adapt to movies, right? Well, Tom Cruise looks nothing like how Jack Reacher is described in the books. And while I thought the first Jack Reacher film was good, the second, Jack Reacher: Never Go Back , is very badly flawed. Based on the JR novel of the sa
Post a Comment
Read more

3 Body Problem

3 Body Problem , Netflix’s latest TV series, is loosely based on the first novel in the Remembrance of Earth's Past trilogy, by Chinese author Liu Cixin (who also wrote the book The Wandering Earth ). Simply put, it’s an alien invasion story, but one that’s a lot more sophisticated than your average ‘pew-pew-pew’ cliché-fest. For one thing, this series begins in the 1960s, in the middle of the Cultural Revolution, which was the nationwide purge instigated within China by then-Chairman Mao to keep himself in power. A young woman named Ye Wenjie arises from the chaos to become a central figure in the overall story. The 3 Body Problem of this series’ name refers to a far-flung solar system that has three suns. Any planet within this tri-sun system would have a hard time of it, taking turns orbiting one belligerent sun after another, and it just so happens that the aliens who set their eyes on invading Earth--known as the San-Ti--come from this embattled world.
Post a Comment
Read more